posted on Thursday, Nov. 30, 2006 @ 15:07
regarding some statistic that read 15.9998: "isn't that the atomic weight of oxygen?"
this was the only time i can think of offhand that i elicited a befuddled look from owen. a blank stare came from doug, too. what? i remember numbers well. it's actually 15.9994 anyway; i was wrong. ;(